Are animals' testing necessary?!
Are animals' testing necessary?
In some cases. yes. Of course not all animals should be subject to animal testing. But the ridiculous loonies of the PETA [PEople for Total Abnormality] have been adamantly opposed to testing animals. Yes, a guy named Bernard Shaw was against it. So Adolf Hitler, too. And if this prohibition gets nastier, the animal testing would be moved to countries like Philippines and Mexico. Try vandalized a laboratory in Mexico and meet the "wonderful" Mexican guys of their Police force. When you meet them, you will wish not to have been born. They ain't friendly. What do you think?
Answers:
Some medical tests like in the field of pharmacokinetics are necessary for new drugs (that treat things like AIDS, diabetes, and cancer), due to the impracticality of using human subjects to determine dosage information, such as what is an effective dosage. There are no computers that can do this. Living organisms are required and unfortunately they cannot use convicted murders or child molesters. So, they must use live animals such as rabbits or monkeys in order to save human lives.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pharmacokin...
PETA and thier followers scare me!
no how about use testing on human and leave the animals alone there are more bad human than there is animals