Which Pic looks better?!
This was the original I made (btw the picture isnt mine, but i came up with the phrase when thinking about people ignoring the fact that animals are being slaughtered and they go and eat it as if nothing is happening)!.
http://img267!.imageshack!.us/my!.php!?image!.!.!.
and someone told me to change the font, so this is now:
http://img366!.imageshack!.us/my!.php!?image!.!.!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
http://img267!.imageshack!.us/my!.php!?image!.!.!.
and someone told me to change the font, so this is now:
http://img366!.imageshack!.us/my!.php!?image!.!.!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Answers:
The first one looks better the second isn't serious looking enough for that picture!. Excuse me, I have to make an animal lover rant!.!.!.
Note:
Here we go!. WOW Elizabeth it REALLY makes sense that you're saying that animal fur looks better on you than the creature God made it for!. Perhaps you have never heard of how they make your precious Arctic Fox hat, huh!? Wouldn't you just love it if YOU were electrocuted and then skinned while you were conscious just because SOMEONE thought your fur looked better on them!?!? HUH!?!!?!!?!!?! And wouldn't you know, it takes more than one pelt to make that dead hat of yours!. I BET if you watched how they made those "MORAL" and "NATURAL" ACCESSORIES of yours you would repent!. For liking fur AND stating to God that the fur God gave those little creatures don't look nice on them!.!.!.if you didn't catch my drift, you just insulted God's choice of skin on the creatures He made!. also, it is not moral to kill animals because you like their skin!. Why don't you just put some hair growing stuff on yourself, huh!? About the same thing!. Except you're not you're wearing DEAD STUFF!. How could you think of them as accessories!?! You SICKEN ME!.!.!. Www@FoodAQ@Com
Note:
Here we go!. WOW Elizabeth it REALLY makes sense that you're saying that animal fur looks better on you than the creature God made it for!. Perhaps you have never heard of how they make your precious Arctic Fox hat, huh!? Wouldn't you just love it if YOU were electrocuted and then skinned while you were conscious just because SOMEONE thought your fur looked better on them!?!? HUH!?!!?!!?!!?! And wouldn't you know, it takes more than one pelt to make that dead hat of yours!. I BET if you watched how they made those "MORAL" and "NATURAL" ACCESSORIES of yours you would repent!. For liking fur AND stating to God that the fur God gave those little creatures don't look nice on them!.!.!.if you didn't catch my drift, you just insulted God's choice of skin on the creatures He made!. also, it is not moral to kill animals because you like their skin!. Why don't you just put some hair growing stuff on yourself, huh!? About the same thing!. Except you're not you're wearing DEAD STUFF!. How could you think of them as accessories!?! You SICKEN ME!.!.!. Www@FoodAQ@Com
well!.!. i think the first one is better, but i don't see how it addresses animal cruelty!. an ostrich with its head in the sand symbolizes ignorance and what you wrote addresses ignorance!. i think the "saying" has too much verbiage in any case!. try something like "just because you ignore something, it doesn't mean it's not going on!.!.!." or something along the lines of thatWww@FoodAQ@Com
wow!. just, you know wow!. Elisabeth, what are you doing in this topic!? Are you actually saying that fur looks better on humans, better on humans than the animal who GOD made that fur for!? It never looks better on people!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Definitely the first one! :D
The second font makes the picture look too busy D:Www@FoodAQ@Com
The second font makes the picture look too busy D:Www@FoodAQ@Com
I like the second font!. It's a little wordy though, maybe put "Ignoring the truth doesn't stop it from happening" or something like that!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
The first one definitely, before you changed it, the second font is much too twee and jokey for anything serious!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Ha!.!.!.I was going to say to take out the "it" in there, but you already did! I think it's cute! (The second one)Www@FoodAQ@Com
I'll go with the first one!. Don't use any fancy text!. Keep it plain!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
tha first one looks better(:Www@FoodAQ@Com
I like the first one!.!.!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
the first one it looks more serious and not a joke :DWww@FoodAQ@Com
ummmm tha first one!?!?!?!? Www@FoodAQ@Com
the first oneWww@FoodAQ@Com
i like the first one!. more simple
who votes we skin elizabeth and turn her into a hat!?Www@FoodAQ@Com
who votes we skin elizabeth and turn her into a hat!?Www@FoodAQ@Com
i'd say the first font!. i agree with the subtitle: just because you ignore the truth doesn't mean that its not happening around you!. but how in the world does that relate to "poor" animals being slaughtered!? come off it! people pull that all the time and its nothing but crap!. yeah, i agree that people shouldn't just kill for the sake of killing, but when you realize how useful animals are!. remember that it was got who killed the first animals in the world and he did it so adam and eve could survive!. when we kill an animal, we don't waste any part of it!. for example: a cow!. we eat the meat of the cow and use its hide to make leather!. how is that sinful and wrong!? another example: a fox!. some people eat fox meat and as far as fur goes, some people stuff them and put them in museums, other people (like me) have the fur made into clothing accessories like hats, scarves and coats!. i don't feel sorry or sinful when i put on my arctic fox zhivago hat!. remember, some animals (if not, most) look better on humans than they do themselves!. what i think of when i read the subtitle are the retarded democrates and the fact that it is their fault that we now have obama as our president!. i hope they take the blame when our country falls because of that ideot!Www@FoodAQ@Com
What is the point of that!?
To let the government know they should fix potholes in the road!?Www@FoodAQ@Com
To let the government know they should fix potholes in the road!?Www@FoodAQ@Com