What do you think of this PETA article... Honest, lies or a mixture of both?!
Viewer discretion advised some photos may upset people!.
http://blog!.peta!.org/archives/2009/03/wh!.!.!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
http://blog!.peta!.org/archives/2009/03/wh!.!.!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Answers:
The pictures are correct, the article/blog is misleading at best!. Thsoe are not teh animals that PETA killed!. Obviously, another publcity gimmick to make excuses for PETA's own suspect "euthanasia" programs and to portray themselves (more importantly, Ingrid Newkirk herself) as heroes!. A very thin PR smoke screen that is so easy to see through!.
PETA "euthanized" healthy animals!. One complaint mentioned the fact that he was promised that his pet would be found a good home!. He later found put the animal was dead before he even left the premises!.
Remember the PETA and Ingrid Newkirk are on record that they support AND advocate the mass extermination of dogs, specifically the Pitbull breed, because they think humans owning pets is "inhumane"!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
PETA "euthanized" healthy animals!. One complaint mentioned the fact that he was promised that his pet would be found a good home!. He later found put the animal was dead before he even left the premises!.
Remember the PETA and Ingrid Newkirk are on record that they support AND advocate the mass extermination of dogs, specifically the Pitbull breed, because they think humans owning pets is "inhumane"!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
go to petakillsanimals!.com
Since 1998 peta has killed roughly 90% of the animals it has taken in, meanwhile a shelter run by the ASPCA no more than 2 miles from the very same peta shelter has had a stellar 73% adoption rate in that same time span!.
So let me get this straight, these 2 shelters are less than 2 miles apart, yet peta kills 90% of it's animals, and the ASPCA shelter kills 27%!. That's a 63% difference!. That just doesn't make sense!. also, this same ASPCA run shelter offered several years ago to relieve peta of some of their "excess animals" to try to find them good homes instead of being put down, peta declined!. They killed them rather than giving them to this shelter that just wanted to help!.
Peta takes in sick animals yes, but many of them are perfectly healthy and adoptable!. They rake in 600 MILLION per year!. Peta's own president has stated that they have the money to run all "no kill" shelters immediately if they wanted to, but it's not worth it for them!. They would rather protest naked and pay celebrities to be in their adds!. Bottom line is; Peta doesn't get their income from helping puppies and kittens, they get money from stupid, naive people who think that peta actually helps animals!. Quite the opposite if you asked me!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Since 1998 peta has killed roughly 90% of the animals it has taken in, meanwhile a shelter run by the ASPCA no more than 2 miles from the very same peta shelter has had a stellar 73% adoption rate in that same time span!.
So let me get this straight, these 2 shelters are less than 2 miles apart, yet peta kills 90% of it's animals, and the ASPCA shelter kills 27%!. That's a 63% difference!. That just doesn't make sense!. also, this same ASPCA run shelter offered several years ago to relieve peta of some of their "excess animals" to try to find them good homes instead of being put down, peta declined!. They killed them rather than giving them to this shelter that just wanted to help!.
Peta takes in sick animals yes, but many of them are perfectly healthy and adoptable!. They rake in 600 MILLION per year!. Peta's own president has stated that they have the money to run all "no kill" shelters immediately if they wanted to, but it's not worth it for them!. They would rather protest naked and pay celebrities to be in their adds!. Bottom line is; Peta doesn't get their income from helping puppies and kittens, they get money from stupid, naive people who think that peta actually helps animals!. Quite the opposite if you asked me!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
I'm sure it's honest!.!.!. I don't care for PETA, but sensationalism is a good way to attract attention!. What is seen on their website is what has been reported!. Think of all the ones that have not been reported!. I don't care for animal pets, but cruel treatment is unnecessary!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
Most of the animals that PETA kills are not that sick!. They just don't want to cut into their multi-million dollar advertising budget to feed them or attempt to find homes!.Www@FoodAQ@Com
miss!.nom!.!.!. I agree completely!.Www@FoodAQ@Com