If everyone stopped killing animals?!
If everyone stopped killing animals?
where would all the animals go? I'm aware that humans woudn't force breed anymore, so that would decrease the animal population. but what about the rest? Where would all the cows and chickens go? And would people create a animal jail for the animals that kill and eat eatch other? Please tell me.. what would peta do? Additional Details
14 hours ago
fairyfly, i would love to wipe my azz with your face
Answers: 14 hours ago
fairyfly, i would love to wipe my azz with your face peta would kill all of those animals and store them in their large secret freezer until they found a way to dispose of the bodies without anyone finding out Source(s):
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/news.cfm... god put animals here for us to eat.why would we stop. If everyone stopped killing animals, you'd be stuck with a lot of animals eating lots of food and no income. Farmers could not afford that. In the long run the cows and pigs would die out because there would be no use for them.
Dog and cat owners would be in trouble because they are meat eaters. They aren't much good at being vegetarians.
If God didn't mean us to eat animals then why did he make them from meat? Stop it! You're making me worried about the grain supply! All those darn rodents...plus we have to contend with ManBearPig!
(Fear not, the insects and bacteria always win in the end...Peta or not, cremated or buried, all humans get recycled into the same food chain, too.) What do they do with cats and dogs?
Sterilize or euthanize, maybe? God put animals here for us to eat? Oh he did, did he?
If you believe in that sh!t, you are just as crazy as the rest of us.
Cause I don't believe in "God", so that settles that. You crazy "God" believer cult person. This is a good question....... I guess people would stop breeding and there would be allot wild animals you know. Since people are not killing them for food. Also there would not be allot of farms or anything anymore it would all be buildings and airports and things like that. You realize that cows, chickens, and pigs existed before we farmed them, right? Hey lindsey, don't be tarded.
Animal rights activists don't have an answer to that question. b/c the U.S. is too crowded, and there is no room, it would be chaos. we have to eliminate and control animals. Might make use of it, hamburgers are fine, just fine I strongly doubt vegetarianism would take over that fast. It would probably take decades to reach even a majority vegetarian population. During that time, fewer animals would be bred because of reduced demand. There is new technology being developed to produce "cultured" meat grown in sheets from cells. This could be used to feed die-hard meat eaters and companion animals, as it greatly reduces suffering, and it takes far less space.
As for existing farm animals, they would probably have to be nurtured for a few generations to return to a semblance of normalcy, as they have been bred to grow as much flesh as quickly as possible and cannot survive on their own.
As for animals that kill other animals, I have no issue with a lioness going after a gazelle. There's a big difference, in case you haven't noticed, between that and humans penning animals up in more and more crowded sheds and feeding them hormones and antibiotics to make them grow bigger faster. Peter K : we are made out of meat so are dogs and cats As the other answerer pointed out, an all-vegetarian society would not happen all at once. Both the animals and humans would have time to adapt.
Nature has a great way of making things right, and a fantastic ability to heal itself. If we stopped mass breeding farm animals for slaughter, there would surely be a painful transition period because generations of these poor animals have lived their entire lives in a manner completely counter to anything natural. However, in a few generations and with the help of conservation groups, these animals can begin to live the normal, happy lives they lived before humans began breeding and torturing them en masse. They would become like any other species that has been threatened by humans, many of which have come back from the brink of extinction.
As for a jail for animals who eat each other, that may be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. You obviously have a negative view of vegetarians and you just as obviously don't know anything about us. Animals eating other animals is a natural thing. There is nothing natural about keeping billions of animals in cages so small they can't move, pumping them full of hormones and antibiotics, and slaughtering them just so Americans can have meat five times a day. Thats just like asking, if people stopped killing each other (where we already die by the billions everyday..lol) would our population increase?? Its sad to me that questioning meat eaters do not recognize that animals are on this earth not to be eaten but to live and be, just like humans are. Its the most basic law of nature..the right to life. Well the cows and chikens would be put back in their natural enviroment.duh and their is a difference betwwen a wild animal killing another animal and humans killing animals.let me explain since you obviously havnt done your research. when a animal kills an animal in nature, they only do it to survive, and the animal who has been or will get eaten at least had a heppy life while it lasted. NOW humans killing animals the way we do it today is INSANE and CRUEL.the animals are born in factories and cramped in sheds with three feet of their own poop and never even see grass or any of their natural enviroment.Its really sad when you think about it.How would you like to be one of those animals???so shut up before you say anything you obviously no nothing about. GO DO SOME RESEARCH DUMB ***!!!! never going to happen. but if it did (which is won't) then cows would die out. we have bred them to be what they are today and they could not survive on their own. they are not adapted to survive anywhere but on a farm.
and hypothetically speaking, this would happe slowly so there wouldn't one day be millions of animals and no farms on which to keep them. gradually farms would begin to downsize and then the number of farms would dwindle and by the time that we were all vegans there would be very few animals in captivity. the ones that remain would fall mercy to natural selection. There would be far fewer, since they would not be bred by the millions and billions for slaughter. If the animals are to be turned loose, I guess it would be a question of either releasing them back in to the wild, or, if this is not feasible, create special preserves for them to live on. Actually, though, I think human guardianship could also be a realistic option. Chickens, cows, and pigs could be kept as pets, much as horses are now. Since these animals have become domesticated, this may actually me better for them than being placed in the wild. With the appropriate guidelines, they would suffer no more as pets than dogs or cats do.
In any case all of this is far off in the future. What should be focused on now is how much suffering we inflict on animals for trivial reasons and the most pragmatic ways to end or lessen this abuse.
Why would there be jail for animals that kill and eat each other? This was a good question until that part. "Jail" is a place for punishment. Since it seems that animals lack reason or a sense of morality, they, unlike humans, cannot be held morally accountable for inflicting needless suffering on others. So there would be no point in punishment. Maybe the world will progress to the point that we can really try to regulate how animals treat each other in the wild, but this is so far in the future, it really is pointless to talk about it now. We can reduce suffering with much greater ease and certainty by eliminating the suffering we cause than by trying to turn the world in to a zoo.
Grae: oh please, you're saying it is wrong to painlessly euthanize animals because their future will be bad otherwise? If so, then every person who has ever had a loving pet put down did the wrong thing. If killing an animal out of compassion to spare it a future of loneliness in a cage is wrong, how much more wrong is it to kill millions and billions of animals in far more painful ways because you like how they taste? Be careful if you want to claim that killing maybe a few thousand animals humanely out of compassion is wrong, because then killing billions inhumanely out of selfishness is going to be VERY wrong. Learn what you are talking about before you post. And if that is too much to ask for, at least make sure that you are not contradicting yourself.