Is, say a fosters less fattening than a stella?!
Is, say a fosters less fattening than a stella?
Additional Details
3 months ago
due to less alcohol content
Answers:
3 months ago
due to less alcohol content
not as fat as this kebab i'm eating after 15 bottles of stella.
No, they are equally fattening.
if i remember corrrectly, one gram of alcohol is 7 calories so when looking at beer, the lower the alcohol content, the less fattening it will be
due to less alcohol content for sure but check the statics on both bottles for real comparison and check the sugar content. Less sugar , less fattening
No I think that both have the same calorie and fat content. The problem is that fosters being less acoholic, has less of an effect on people, helping them to drink more as the night goes on. Hence, although not as strong, people drinking fosters all night will be less drunk than those drinking stella which is really strong!
IF YOU CARE YOU ARE UNWORTHY OF EITHER! buy an o'doul"s & bemoan the death of the panet wth ALL THE OTHER PANSIES!
i say wow
All good booze is fattening , so screw it and enjoy , or take up Drag racing or pissing off your mom,, either way you are gonna get it !
There was someone on the tv the other day that said booze wasn't fattening. They said it's just what you eat with it as you get drunk.
To all the sceptics out there who don't believe it, try asking them how many fat alcoholics they know?
So go on & enjoy your pint it could be aiding a diet!
The alcohol content doesn't make it more fattening. Spirits have less calories and carbs than beers and lagers, dry wine is not too bad. I'd guess the higher the alcohol the lower the cals (or carbs at least).
not due to alcohol content! The calorific content is as follows
Alcopops
Beers
Wines
Spirits
Highest calories first, just as standard