How would you describe the Miller beer?!
How would you describe the Miller beer?
How does it taste? Is it special not very interesting? Relatively cheap? Or expensive? What do you think of it?
Answers:
it's pretty light and has a chemical taste to it. Isn't worth the money.
Source(s):
experience
a very week bittertasting beer.yes it is very cheap.i just dont care for the taste.
I'll occasionally drink a Miller, although I prefer something a little heartier as a rule.
Miller's an OK beer. Not great. It's a pilsner, so it has very little "body" to it, and no aftertaste. But it's mildly hoppy, slightly tart, and (I think) pretty refreshing when it's ice-cold.
It's priced pretty competitively, versus other mainstream beers in the USA (such as Budweiser). Compared to microbrews and imports, I would call it "cheap", but I mean that mainly in the sense of price, not quality.
typical mass produced American-style lager... i.e. watery. It's cheap and tastes like crap. try a real beer, like Samuel Adams Lager.
beer all beer tastes like shite
Very light bodied, relatively flavorless beer. Good for drinking after mowing the lawn at best.
the champagne of beers that's what the bottle says
I describe it as "not welcome in my refrigerator".....it is relatively cheap, you can get better tasting cheaper beer.