How can Miller make a Man Law against fruit in beer but then come out with Miller Chill??!
How can Miller make a Man Law against fruit in beer but then come out with Miller Chill??
Answers: Big companies do it all the time. "We will never EVER have a product like this. It just isn't done here." And the next thing you know, they've "invented" something that was suggested by a consumer... and it was exactly the product they said they would never EVER sell.
Buncha hypocrites! lol when one of the executives goes to a party and see's everyone drinking Corona with lime they get a stupid marketing idea that it would work with Miller beer. Haha cause you don't actually put a lime wedge in it like some people do with Corona's. I tried that Miller Chill....don't know why, but someone bought em and I had one....won't do that again.
"I had scurvy once.....don't fruit the beer!" I am not familiar with Miller Chill yet. But yes, if they came out with a fruity beer they need to be boycotted. I certainly will, man law is man law. if you're going to invoke man law, then you have to live up to it. money making strategy. Miller chill is artificially flavored. Therefore there is no fruit in the beer. therefore they have not violated the man law. if its artificial then why do they call it an authentic mexican recipe? that means they are liars and fakes I know, right?! How ironic can you get w/o puking?
I am a huge fan of MGD (in fact, it's the only domestic beer I'll drink)...but that Miller Chill just took it a bit too far.
What hypocrites! Bahahahaha that was a great question. You should put it to Miller. Maybe they will do a commercial repealing the 'Man Law" That depends, who's the current CEO of the company? If it's a woman, then it would make sense if Man Law no longer applies to their products. But even if only the advertising executive is a woman, than any attempt to actually enforce "Man Law" in their policies could be deemed sexual harassment or discrimination and might get the company seriously sued.